|
|
| Ethical
Relativism
|
|
(Click here to continue on the main
path) |
John Speaking
|
Let me build on what
Ayesha is saying. I think we first have to understand that ethical
relativism is a doctrine that was formulated in reaction to older
ideas. I think that is the key to a useful definition.
Looking at relativism as a reaction, we could define it as the
denial of the following:
- Moral evaluations are objective in some sense. When I say
objective, I mean that they have a source outside human decisions
and choices.
- There is one moral truth. If two moral evaluations conflict, one
of them is incorrect.
- The same morality is binding on all people (or, as some would
say, on all reasonable beings).
I think this is the core of what the relativist is saying. He or
she denies these more traditional claims.
|
|