Ariadne's Thread on Ethical Relativism
Replies
speaker
Sidgwick
(main path)

speaker
Vera

speaker
Ayesha

speaker
Comment
 
Ethical Relativism

(Click here to continue on the main path)

John Speaking
Let me build on what Ayesha is saying. I think we first have to understand that ethical relativism is a doctrine that was formulated in reaction to older ideas. I think that is the key to a useful definition.

Looking at relativism as a reaction, we could define it as the denial of the following:

  • Moral evaluations are objective in some sense. When I say objective, I mean that they have a source outside human decisions and choices.
  • There is one moral truth. If two moral evaluations conflict, one of them is incorrect.
  • The same morality is binding on all people (or, as some would say, on all reasonable beings).

I think this is the core of what the relativist is saying. He or she denies these more traditional claims.


Ariadne's Home Contact Ariadne at: Ethical Relativism Home
Ethics Bibliography Ethical Relativism Contents