(Return to main path )

I'm not so sure about this idea of communal ownership of natural resources.

One leading libertarian, Robert Nozick, agreed that something like the Lockean proviso should be incorporated into a theory of property. But for Nozick, that only meant that if someone took ownership in some resource it shouldn't be a net loss for the others.

There are other libertarians who think that the whole idea of natural resources being owned in common to begin with is a mistake. Natural resources aren't owned by anyone to begin with, they are just THERE. As a result, if someone makes a claim to a piece of land, she doesn't violate anyone's rights to that land.