I'm
not a secular libertarian like Dee or a secular utilitarian like Ann.
But I'm not a theologically based conservative like Fred either.
There are more alternatives, including some that we don't talk much
about. I want to go back to something that I said earlier about some
of the assumptions of liberalism. The liberal theory of strong individual rights is based on a number of assumptions that I find questionable.
- Many liberals think of the individual as autonomous. I think the autonomous individual is a myth.
We owe almost all that we are to the society around us.
- Libertarian liberals like Dee tend to reduce all our moral
obligations to either respecting the rights of others or observing
contracts that we have made with others. I think there are duties and responsibilities to others
that go beyond that.
I see the individual as much more a part of society in an essential way. I have been
reading some of the communitarian philosophers and critics -- Mary Ann Glendon and Michael Sandel for example. And I am beginning to wonder whether the basis of liberal social theory -- with its emphasis on the autonomous individual and individual liberty -- has
fatal problems.
|