I think that Wong wants to say that in this sort of case there is no logical conflict between the two moral judgments. Instead, he describes the conflict as pragmatic. I think by that he means that the two judgments, although both true in our sense, conflict in that they cannot both be acted upon in the same case.

I think Wong's view makes sense for specific moral judgments like this one about whether polygamy is wrong. But what about Ayesha's question? Wong's view makes reference to rules or what we have called principles. What about them? What would it mean to say that rules or principles are true or false?

Take the principle professor Sidgwick mentioned: "It is morally wrong to kill innocent human beings." Can we say anything about it?