I
think that's a good point. Maybe the differences between different
cultures aren't nearly as fundamental as Herskovits thought.
This reminds me of the fact that David Hume, the 18th-century
Scottish philosopher, thought that underneath the differences among
cultures there were certain underlying similarities. He thought that
all cultures approve kindness, loyalty, truthfulness, and so on.
In fairness to Herskovits, however, I think he did allow for the
possibility of what he called "universals." These were
values or moral views common to all cultures. But, of course,
Herskovits didn't just assume that there were universals. He felt that
it was an empirical question that could only be answered by careful
field work.
In fairness to anthropology, I believe that many later
anthropologists have felt that Herskovits and Benedict exaggerated the
moral differences between cultures.