I want to go back to the question Professor Sidgwick raised. He asked
whether the differences in moral systems in
different cultures mattered for ethics or meta-ethics.
I think we need to know more about the differences. The
anthropologists have done a good job of describing all kinds of
differences. But suppose what
looks at first like an important difference is really only the
application of the same fundamental principle to different situations?
Then the differences are not fundamental and probably not very
important. I don't think Herskovits addressed this issue.
So my questions are these:
- What does it mean to say that differences between moral
systems are fundamental?
- Are the existing differences - about polygamy for example -
fundamental?