Sources & Extracts

Review this excerpt and then use the BACK key in your browser to return to the page you were on.


Catharine MacKinnon suggests that some restrictions on speech can be legally justified on the basis of a right to equal access to education:
…[T]he virtual absence of discussion of equality in recent litigation over discrimination policies that prohibit group-based harassment and bigotry on campuses was astounding. Denominated "campus speech codes" by their opponents, these regulations are formally predicated on federal laws that require equal access to an education on the basis of race and sex. In challenges to these regulations under the First Amendment, which have been successful so far, the statutory equality interest is barely mentioned. That these procedures might vindicate a constitutional interest in equality which is as important as, or part of, the speech interest used to demolish them is not considered.

Reference: Catherine MacKinnon, Only Words, p. 87. Brackets added.