Related Ideas | Review these ideas and then use the BACK key in your browser to return to the page you were on. |
One of the most common and useful distinctions is between the
"classical" liberalism of the 19th century
and the "welfare state" liberalism of the 20th.
Broadly speaking, classical liberalism emphasized strong rights
of property and the virtues of small governments and free markets
while welfare state liberalism has sought to regulate property
and emphasize the virtues of an active, problem solving government
that often interferes with the free market. Welfare state liberals
also frequently advocate greater individual freedom from moral
conventions and greater freedom to choose a life style (although in this they are joined by libertarians).
Modern "libertarianism" developed out of the ideas of
Ayn Rand, John Hospers, Robert Nozick and others. It is similar
to classical liberalism in its emphasis on strong property rights
but closer to welfare state liberalism in its enthusiasm for a
variety of life styles.
Even if we use the distinction between classical and welfare state
liberalism, however, we find very different philosophical approaches
within each category. Some of these writers are utilitarians while
others believe in natural rights or in an ethics based on reason.
Some stress the priority of individual rights while others stress
the importance of maximizing "the good." Some believe
that consequences determine the morality of our actions while
others believe that some actions are good in themselves or because
they meet some other kind of criterion. Some are Christians while
others are theological agnostics.
Although most historians agree on the list of major liberal philosophers, it is difficult to say just how the liberal tradition is unified. The philosophers listed here have very different metaphysical views and very different views on the foundations of ethics and social philosophy.