|
(Fred Speaking) | ||||||
MAIN PATH: Ann | |||||||
I reject this notion of a dilemma as far as stigma is concerned.
I want you to set aside all ethical issues concerning liberty
rights, equality rights, the right not to be stigmatized, and
so on. I want you to focus for a moment on what government or
any small group of intellectuals can accomplish. Your faith in
government, policy, and law has been so conditioned that you think
that something as amorphous and multi-faceted as stigma can be
controlled by intellectuals with their hands on the levers of
government power. That's simply a mistake. The process of reducing
stigma is inevitably long and the means must be indirect.
Government can do very little to directly change widespread attitudes
and beliefs that are reinforced by facts, symbols, and tradition.
Even if government were willing to do whatever it can to eliminate
stigma, it could do very little.
Don't misunderstand me. I'm not saying that government can do nothing. I'm saying that its role is minor and what it does must be rather indirect.
| Ariadne Home | Hate Speech Bibliography |
Hate Speech Home |