|
(Vera Speaking) | ||||||
MAIN PATH: Malik | |||||||
Malik and I have talked about this and we basically agree on how
to think about it. We strongly disagree with Fred's description
of this as the work of isolated individuals. We agree with Ann
that this can be seen as harassment that is partly the result
of pressures on campus. But we would go further.
We need an even broader context for this so-called "incident."
Midwest University does not exist in a vacuum. It exists in and
was created by the people who run the larger society. It is not
only their creature and not only a functional part of that larger
society, but it mirrors the hierarchies of power and privilege
that exist in that society.
The struggles of blacks and women on this campus are part of a
larger struggle in society to upset those hierarchies and redistribute
power. Some of the white students here may only dimly understand
that. But what is at stake in that struggle, both here and in
society, are the structures of domination that have developed
over centuries of white male rule.
What we saw Saturday is a reaction to that struggle, a reaction
to the dimly felt loss of privilege and an almost instinctive
defense of the entire structure of which that privilege is a
part. Language is a part of that defense. It is a tool, a weapon
wielded against the weaker members of society to keep them 'in
their place.'
To see what happened Saturday correctly, we have see it as a reflection of that larger society and a reaction to those who seek to change it. We should think of this as assaultive speech that intentionally or unintentionally tends to recreate and reinforce unjust social hierarchies. To respond properly to what happened, we have to change those structures. One place to begin the struggle is by stopping the speech that reinforces them.
| Ariadne Home | Hate Speech Bibliography |
Hate Speech Home |