(Return to main path)

I don't like putting this in terms of goals. That's way too teleological for me.

I think in terms of rights, not goals or outcomes. We could say that protecting rights is the goal, but that might be misleading.

It is easy to fall into the habit of speaking in a way that suggests that the goal or outcome is the only thing that counts and that our choice of means is justified by achieving the outcome. I don't believe that. I believe that the whole purpose of recognizing individual rights is to put constraints on the means that can be used to achieve outcomes, some of which might be morally quite good, but still unjust.