You
guys are hitting me pretty hard here. I didn't mean to say that
science can always answer the question "What's morally
relevant."
But science can often provide information that is helpful when deciding what's morally relevant and what is just. It's not completely
helpless. In the case of abortion, for example, science can tell us
things like
- How and when the nervous system and brain functions of
the fetus develop over time
- When the fetus is capable of living outside its mother
- Whether the mother's health is at risk if she delivers
the baby
|
So let's give science some credit here. These things are all relevant to deciding whether abortion is morally acceptable, aren't they?
|