Your second argument depends on empirical claims. Frankly, I think
there are lots of countries where property rights have become weaker
in the last 75 years and other individual rights have become
stronger at the same time. That's exactly what has happened
in
the United States. It shows that the other rights don't depend on strong property
rights as you suggest.
As a matter of fact, I think some people would make an argument
that is just the opposite of the one you make. Libertarian property
rights may well lead to great inequality in the distribution of wealth
and income. That inequality increases the effective liberty to
the people with great wealth and reduces the effective liberty
of the people with very little. Everyone's formal liberty may
be equal, but the effective liberty goes to those with great
wealth. You're simply ignoring the problem.
|