I
don't think the relativist can say anything similar about principles
or standards.
Moral judgments can be made with reference to a principle or
standard. But standards aren't true or
false. Is the standard meter in Paris true or false? No. It is the
standard by which other measurements are said to be true or false.
But we can say
other things about standards. For example:
- Standards are better or worse in some respect.
- Standards are applicable or in applicable.
- Standards are accepted or rejected.
What I'm suggesting is that when we shift from moral judgments to
moral standards or first principles, we can no longer talk about truth
and falsity. We have to talk about something else.