If
we are listing factors to consider when justifying interference, I
have something to add.
First of all, there are cases in which we might intervene to help
people who do not share the dominant values of their culture or group.
If there are women desperate for ways to have fewer children and we
are thinking of interfering with their culture in order to provide
such devices, the fact that they want them matters.
Second, we often speak as though people simply have certain values
and neglect the process by which they have come to have those values.
There are cases in which women and other groups have internalized
certain values, but they have done so because of long periods of
domination and oppression. When someone accepts values under those
circumstances, we might call the values 'inauthentic.' On the other
hand, 'authentic' values are those arrived at under conditions of free
discussion and deliberation. Again, if we are considering interfering
with another culture - or any group - I think this distinction
matters.