Ariadne's Thread on Ethical Relativism
Replies
speaker
(Return)

speaker
Comment

 
 
 
Moral Knowledge

(Click here to return to the main path)

Fred Speaking
There is another way to think about "foundations" for morals and why people think that ethical relativism implies an absence of foundations.

We said before that relativism can be thought of as an epistemological thesis, a metaphysical thesis, or a linguistic thesis. The metaphysical thesis claims that moral evaluations are not part of the basic furniture of the universe. Instead, moral evaluations are created by people or added to the universe by people.

As a result, someone might say, there is nothing 'out there' for moral evaluations or principles to correspond to or to describe or to be checked against. And it is the absence of this reality that leaves us without foundations for ethics.

I would like to say that I am uncertain about this. I'm not sure whether there is something objective to check our moral principles against. I'm just not sure. What would "ultimate reality" have to be like in order to provide a foundation for ethics?


Ariadne's Home Contact Ariadne at: Ethical Relativism Home
Ethics Bibliography Ethical Relativism Contents