I'm
glad to hear Fred describe the situation in terms of two groups that
accept different principles.
We have talked a lot about different cultures and the cultural
relativism of Herskovits and Benedict. I'm not so sure that all the
talk about different cultures is relevant to the main issues of
tolerance, criticism, and interference.
The important point is that the world contains
groups and individuals with different moral principles. It doesn't
matter whether they divide nicely into different cultures. As a matter
of fact, I don't think they do. Right here in our own culture we have
people who accept different moral principles. All of the issues about
tolerance, criticism, and interference arise within our culture just
as they do between cultures.
For example, if my next door neighbor believes that he has the
right to beat his wife if she doesn't cook dinner, can anyone
interfere? Let's assume he has moral principles that allow him to beat
her. How do we justify interference? I'm not sure that this problem is
any different from the problem of interference across cultures.