|
| ||
CONTINUE ON | Review Related Ideas and then Return Here | ||
Baruch Brody has suggested that we need not say that the embryo
or fetus has a right to its mother's body, but rather that she
does not have the right to kill it in the exercise of her right
to bodily control. On this view, her situation is like a person
who has a right to control and defend her bicycle, but does not
thereby have a right to kill someone because they
try to steal the bike.
But what about Thomson's violinist? Would you maintain that the
person to whom the violinist is attached must remain so if the
only way to sever the link kills the violinist? What if the violinist
requires your kidneys for the next 50 years?
If your intuitions here are inconsistent, what principle should you use to decide between them?
| Ariadne Home | Abortion Bibliography | Abortion Home |