|
| ||
CONTINUE ON | |||
If you find Brody's argument plausible, you must follow the thread and consider
possible objections. A critic might argue that loss of brain and
heart functions does not mark the end of a person's life after
all. They mark the death of the organism, but the person is gone
when the higher brain functions are irreversibly lost. If this
view is accepted, the embryo/fetus only becomes a person when
the higher brain functions emerge. The physiological basis of
such functions emerges late in pregnancy. The functions themselves
(e.g., abstract reasoning) do not appear until after birth.
Why should we accept a definition of humanity or personhood that stresses heart and brain functions that people have in common with lower animals? After all, it is personhood that we need to understand.
| Ariadne Home | Abortion Bibliography | Abortion Home |