|
| ||
CONTINUE ON | |||
A pattern emerges from following the thread through questions
about persons and from looking at the Catholic and Evangelical
views. The same pattern will continue to hold when we look at
the nature of moral rights. All of these approaches to the morality
of abortion attempt to answer a basic question: What are the
boundaries of the moral community? They attempt to define
a criterion for membership in that community and to decide whether
an embryo or a fetus or an infant falls inside or outside the
community. If the embryo/fetus falls outside the moral community,
it will be relatively easy to decide on the morality of abortion.
If it falls inside the community, the question will be more complex.
In secular moral philosophy, this question takes the form of asking
whether the embryo/fetus is a person or whether it has rights.
In the Evangelical tradition, it takes the form of asking whether
it bears the image of God. For Catholics it takes the form of
asking whether it has been ensouled. For those who stress biological
facts, it takes the form of asking whether the biological elements
necessary for complete individualization are present. Each approach
has a different criterion for determining the boundaries of the
moral community, but they are all searching for an answer to the same question.
We do not ordinarily have to decide on the precise boundary of the moral community. That is one reason why the question of abortion is so difficult. Yet the boundary question arises more and more often in such cases as severe retardation and irreversible coma.
| Ariadne Home | Abortion Bibliography | Abortion Home |