|
| ||
CONTINUE ON | |||
If you are inclined to agree with Thomson, consider this case:
Suppose that the fetus developed much further during pregnancy than it actually does. Assume that it develops so much that
everyone agrees that it is a person. It learns to talk while in
the womb, plays games with its mother, and becomes a part of social
life --yet it still depends entirely upon her for nutrition. It
needs special nutrients from her body and there are no substitutes
for them. It will die if removed from her womb before eight months
have passed.
With this hypothetical case we have eliminated doubts about personhood. Would the mother's right to control her body include the right to kill such a fetus after seven months, when it is clearly a small person? Would it matter whether she wanted to become pregnant? Whether she tried to avoid becoming pregnant? Whether she had a serious reason to terminate the pregnancy? Why or why not?
| Ariadne Home | Abortion Bibliography | Abortion Home |