![]() |
Violinist II: Objections | ||
CONTINUE ON | |||
In order for Wennberg's hypothetical case to be like pregnancy,
we must assume that the mother knew ahead of time that the serum
would make her son dependent upon her. Does this knowledge entail
responsibilities on her part? Perhaps the time for her to consider
whether she will remain hooked up is before she acts in such a
way as to make him dependent?
Suppose I fund a nine month Arctic expedition and agree to send weekly shipments of food to the explorers. After two months I change my mind. Am I within my rights to stop? I would be breaking a contract with the explorers. Is that crucial? Suppose I fund a nine month treatment program for people with a deadly disease that makes them unconscious. I must supply funds every week, but after two months I want to stop. If there is no contract with the sick people, am I within my rights?
| Ariadne Home | Abortion Bibliography | Abortion Home |